<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refactoring on Linsomniac&#39;s Articles</title>
    <link>https://linsomniac.com/tags/refactoring/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Refactoring on Linsomniac&#39;s Articles</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <managingEditor>jafo00@gmail.com (Sean Reifschneider)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>jafo00@gmail.com (Sean Reifschneider)</webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://linsomniac.com/tags/refactoring/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Deep nesting vs Magic</title>
      <link>https://linsomniac.com/post/2023-03-25-deep_nesting_vs_magic/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>jafo00@gmail.com (Sean Reifschneider)</author>
      <guid>https://linsomniac.com/post/2023-03-25-deep_nesting_vs_magic/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I had a piece of code that was deeply nested for loops, and I wanted to see what it
could look like if it wasn&amp;rsquo;t deeply nested.  Deep nesting is the root of all evil,
you know.  Which is the most clear, maintainable code?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
